Silvia Nitti
Professor Finegan of the University of Rome three thought that the Marx of Capital, is one that can actually be useful again, and above all, to read today's reality.
Hegel thought that philosophy was born "in certain circumstances of a tear, in times when we need a synthesis, a reconstruction of lives." The Marx
with which we "left-wing youth" we usually do not think there is a philosophy, but what he thought was not himself a philosopher, a politician, an advocate of "revolutionary praxis."
But we know as the Marxist policy has proved its failure, faced with the reality of history.
Even from an economic standpoint his vision has many flaws. Capitalism has proved its capacity to regenerate itself with much more force than necessary for its survival, in a geometric progression scary! Therefore
prof. teaches us that, pace of dear Charles, what can we take him is his philosophy. You
the thought of Marx philosopher who teaches us, significantly ahead of the times, that capitalism is "an abstract of the socialization factor" and, as such, a proponent of abstract wealth that apparently produces material goods. The real objective of the capital and its own reproduction. As Finer notes, this capital, as defined and understood, is very similar to the Spirit of Hegel's memory, able to approve all to himself.
not we see this design has been a sketch of a globalized society and capitalist who is leading the man to destruction, in our prosperous days?
And is not to be understood in terms of a capitalist society that Great Spirit superstructure has sacrificed in the name of the structure?
Capitalist society is not only able to survive in itself, but also to expand in all fields of human life, then even in his mental production.
"This is the factory to define what is moral and what is not," said Finelli. With globalization, the process could only magnified. This "Americanism without America," which today we are not so keen observers, tells of a society that can go on Florida without need of a class of intellectuals to explain the wounds of our time.
And here we are catapulted into a world made of sequins, for In the words of the professor, the external and superficial, where man freed from the burdens of manual labor can take care of rouge on his case. No longer a class of intellectuals capable of explaining the world, it produces a fierce discrepancy between the essence of life and the perception of it. So, what is important is not the creative production of human beings through the new tools of modern technology, but an unceasing development of "capacity-logical discourse" in themselves, prepared by brains more and more like machines. While the modern
enhances the body, enhances the postmodern mind, drawing perfectly the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. But instead to capitalize on the exciting possibility of free man by fatigue of the assembly, postmodernism is festering in sterile reproduction of negative infinity, hiding well enough not to even feel this way.
In fact, he reveals Finelli, there is no discontinuity between modern and postmodern, the one is the natural continuation of the other. We just let the evil spirit of the great capitalist Pacman take over and devour the soul of our thinking.
"We must think of a theory of subjectivity that must be built and not assumed to history!"
In light of these insights, I think that our ability to remain thinking subjects, despite everything, can actually fill our time without farcene eat, can exert long to give "false friends" mythological as the class struggle or the revolution of the people. We live in a time when the complexity has become the keystone of the whole system. Duty to return to the old categories and belonging to a world shaped so as to become outdated, in fact, myth is not only logically wrong operation, but also very dangerous, because it means easy to simplify a world that has only the superficiality of its rhinestones. ..
Professor Finegan of the University of Rome three thought that the Marx of Capital, is one that can actually be useful again, and above all, to read today's reality.
Hegel thought that philosophy was born "in certain circumstances of a tear, in times when we need a synthesis, a reconstruction of lives." The Marx
with which we "left-wing youth" we usually do not think there is a philosophy, but what he thought was not himself a philosopher, a politician, an advocate of "revolutionary praxis."
But we know as the Marxist policy has proved its failure, faced with the reality of history.
Even from an economic standpoint his vision has many flaws. Capitalism has proved its capacity to regenerate itself with much more force than necessary for its survival, in a geometric progression scary! Therefore
prof. teaches us that, pace of dear Charles, what can we take him is his philosophy. You
the thought of Marx philosopher who teaches us, significantly ahead of the times, that capitalism is "an abstract of the socialization factor" and, as such, a proponent of abstract wealth that apparently produces material goods. The real objective of the capital and its own reproduction. As Finer notes, this capital, as defined and understood, is very similar to the Spirit of Hegel's memory, able to approve all to himself.
not we see this design has been a sketch of a globalized society and capitalist who is leading the man to destruction, in our prosperous days?
And is not to be understood in terms of a capitalist society that Great Spirit superstructure has sacrificed in the name of the structure?
Capitalist society is not only able to survive in itself, but also to expand in all fields of human life, then even in his mental production.
"This is the factory to define what is moral and what is not," said Finelli. With globalization, the process could only magnified. This "Americanism without America," which today we are not so keen observers, tells of a society that can go on Florida without need of a class of intellectuals to explain the wounds of our time.
And here we are catapulted into a world made of sequins, for In the words of the professor, the external and superficial, where man freed from the burdens of manual labor can take care of rouge on his case. No longer a class of intellectuals capable of explaining the world, it produces a fierce discrepancy between the essence of life and the perception of it. So, what is important is not the creative production of human beings through the new tools of modern technology, but an unceasing development of "capacity-logical discourse" in themselves, prepared by brains more and more like machines. While the modern
enhances the body, enhances the postmodern mind, drawing perfectly the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. But instead to capitalize on the exciting possibility of free man by fatigue of the assembly, postmodernism is festering in sterile reproduction of negative infinity, hiding well enough not to even feel this way.
In fact, he reveals Finelli, there is no discontinuity between modern and postmodern, the one is the natural continuation of the other. We just let the evil spirit of the great capitalist Pacman take over and devour the soul of our thinking.
"We must think of a theory of subjectivity that must be built and not assumed to history!"
In light of these insights, I think that our ability to remain thinking subjects, despite everything, can actually fill our time without farcene eat, can exert long to give "false friends" mythological as the class struggle or the revolution of the people. We live in a time when the complexity has become the keystone of the whole system. Duty to return to the old categories and belonging to a world shaped so as to become outdated, in fact, myth is not only logically wrong operation, but also very dangerous, because it means easy to simplify a world that has only the superficiality of its rhinestones. ..
